This recent NY Times article examines how states are positioning themselves from an education policy and programmatic perspective to gain an edge in the new administrations "Race to the Top" fund worth about $4 billion cumulatively. One of the requirements of the grant proposal is for each state to get acceptance from all stakeholders (education unions and school boards) on the issue of tying teacher evaluations to student performance on standardized tests. Another requirement is for each state competing for Race to the Top funds to buy into the national educational standards movement and accept the forthcoming federal curriculum standards as their benchmark for student learning in their state, effectively eliminating their own curriculum standards. I wonder if either of these policy changes at the state levels actually offers any innovation. It is my belief that most school leaders evaluate their faculty at least partly on student performance. In addition, changing student learning benchmarks from state to national sounds like just more of the same. For $4 billion dollars, I would hope that we could buy some serious innovation and reform that engages the best minds in education with the best and brightest in technology to come up with innovative tools and resources that help us teach and assess the best ways we know how. What are your thoughts on this important topic?
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Race to the Top: Innovation or Repurposing More of the Same?
This recent NY Times article examines how states are positioning themselves from an education policy and programmatic perspective to gain an edge in the new administrations "Race to the Top" fund worth about $4 billion cumulatively. One of the requirements of the grant proposal is for each state to get acceptance from all stakeholders (education unions and school boards) on the issue of tying teacher evaluations to student performance on standardized tests. Another requirement is for each state competing for Race to the Top funds to buy into the national educational standards movement and accept the forthcoming federal curriculum standards as their benchmark for student learning in their state, effectively eliminating their own curriculum standards. I wonder if either of these policy changes at the state levels actually offers any innovation. It is my belief that most school leaders evaluate their faculty at least partly on student performance. In addition, changing student learning benchmarks from state to national sounds like just more of the same. For $4 billion dollars, I would hope that we could buy some serious innovation and reform that engages the best minds in education with the best and brightest in technology to come up with innovative tools and resources that help us teach and assess the best ways we know how. What are your thoughts on this important topic?
Labels:
curriculum standards.,
race to the top
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Should we monitor student teacher electronic communication?

This article from Education Week this week explains the new law in LA that requires students and teachers to document and save any communication that occurs between students and teachers on personal electronic devices (not supplied by school or occurring on school network servers). The obvious intention of this law is to insure that students remain safe while reducing teacher liabilities. However, this law feels Orwellian by nature and could further erode the critical relationship between student and teacher. What are your thoughts on this new law and how it impacts student teacher interaction?
Monday, November 2, 2009
One Example of How Technology Has Transformed This Student's Life
This student's testimony to Congress shows in real human terms how access to technology and his teachers willingness to integrate it throughout the learning process has transformed his life for the better. Having worked with students from urban communities where student and teacher access to digital media for teaching and learning is sparse, I can attest to this young man's portrayal of the power of the tools he utilized in his education. However, I have also seen the gross misuse of technology as an educational tool. What are your thoughts on the promise and peril of digital media as a teaching and learning tool?
Labels:
achievement,
digital media,
impact,
learning,
teaching,
technology
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)